Comments on: Celebrity Oops – Sheryl Crow?

By: mikey

mikey — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:37:00 +0000

I donno she was probably drunk at the time

By: theamanda haemophilia

theamanda haemophilia — Sat, 02 May 2009 04:55:11 +0000

pardon my opinion & choice of words, but bluntly, this blog is plainly laughable & vapid. first of all, recycling is about protecting the environment, not saving some billionaire’s thick bank account. and as to not being so extravagant on toilet papers — why the hell not?

By: natalie

natalie — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:14:41 +0000

She should be sentenced to a commune in Oregon with 300 stinky hippies , no running water, toilets, and granola. Then maybe just maybe she will learn not to mess with the greeny’s

By: BEVERLY

BEVERLY — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:32:27 +0000

no Mia, we are not running out of trees. Do your homework before you go spouting off. Check the acreage of planted pines in the south, particularly south ala, ga and miss! Where do you live? In a cement city or some swanky subdivision that was clear cut for you to have the good life? We are stewards of the land….are you?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 18 May 2008 20:14:48 +0000

you can wipe it now or later.you are,a prophet,they come toyou,for that reason you are smart iwill leave you alone,better off ,if you getold,try it . you lost your mind iswa what is wrong.

By: PJ

PJ — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:52:57 +0000

I would love for Sheryl Crow herself to send me an e-mail…I think that she is the best of the best and the most talent and beautiful woman in the face of the earth!

By: angie d.

angie d. — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:47:21 +0000

sheryl crow is amazing. that’s final.

By: Al Potter

Al Potter — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:59:51 +0000

She was making a joke. Everyone knows three squares is the magic number.

By: Mia

Mia — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:51:48 +0000

About your comment on recycling –

Cost is no longer the end-all of recycling. Sure, you are right — recycling paper and plastic costs more than making them. The relevant point here is that, WE ARE RUNNING OUT of both TREES ~and~ PETROLEUM TO MAKE PAPER AND PLASTIC.

50% of what fills landfills is paper. Half of all trash doesn’t have to be there taking up space. We need more trees to soak up the CO2 we’re dumping into the air. The problem is that the loop of recycling often remains open: the consumer fails to BUY recycled paper. If we did buy recycled paper, the cost of recycling it would go down.

Everyone is aware of the sociological and political consequences of running out of oil, smthg predicted to happen w/in 25 yrs or so.

Glass can be recycled INDEFINITELY. Recycling metal is the most important of all — recycling aluminum saves 90% of the energy needed to make it from scratch.

So, whatever it is Sheryl Crow tried to communicate tactlessly, maybe she did have a point.

Sincerely,
A student of epidemiology & environmental public health

By: Mia

Mia — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:46:31 +0000

About your comment on recycling –

50% of what fills landfills is paper. Half of all trash doesn’t have to be there taking up space. We need more trees to soak up the CO2 we’re dumping into the air. Everyone is aware of the sociological and political consequences of running out of oil, smthg predicted to happen w/in 25 yrs or so.

Glass can be recycled INDEFINITELY. Recycling metal is the most important of all — recycling aluminum saves 90% of the energy needed to make it from scratch.

So, whatever it is Sheryl Crow tried to communicate tactlessly, maybe she did have a point.

Sincerely,
A student of epidemiology & environmental public health